Agents break in, write the fix, and prove it held

An agent-native security platform for applications. Agents break into your app the way an adversary would, prove what is exploitable with a working exploit, write the fix, and attack the patched build to confirm it closed. Red team and blue team as one loop, rather than a report you have to act on yourself.

Your applications: the apps, APIs, and cloud they run on. Uvy breaks in, proves what is exploitable, writes the patch into your codebase, and opens the pull request, then attacks the patched build to confirm it closed.

Every finding that reaches you carries the exploit we used: the exact request, the response, and the data it reached. Candidates are re-run in a clean environment and argued against before they count, so what lands on your desk is what survived the challenge rather than what a scanner suspected.

We write it. The root cause is traced across code, containers, and cloud configuration, the patch is written into your codebase rather than lifted from a generic advisory, and it arrives as a pull request with the diff attached, routed to the team that owns the file. The test of any security product is whether a change ships, and who had to write it.

We replay the original exploit against the patched build. It closes only when the attack that worked before fails. Partial fixes come back with exactly what still gets through, and every closure carries dated, reproducible evidence.

Both, as one loop. Red team runs recon and exploit. Blue team takes over at triage, writes the fix, and verifies it held. Offense earning the finding is what makes the remediation trustworthy, which is why we do not think these can be separate products.

Yes, and always. Everything runs in sealed, single-use infrastructure under strict scope, with pre-flight checks and an instant kill-switch. You set scope, approve escalations, and can stop a run at any point.

What changed, what is closed, what is still open, and what needs a decision, in language that survives a quarterly review. If a security report only makes sense to the security team, it does not do the job it was written for.

Continuous threat exposure management is the current name for what most teams still call vulnerability management. It runs in five stages: decide what is in scope, discover what you have, prioritize what matters, validate whether an attacker could use it, and mobilize the fix. Scanners have always covered the first three. The last two are newer, and they are where programs fall apart, because most tools guess at exploitability instead of testing it and most stop at a ticket instead of a closed hole. Uvy is built for those two, which here means running the exploit rather than modelling one, then writing the fix and attacking the patched version to confirm it held. We do this for applications, and we do not cover network or identity exposure, so inside a broader program we handle the part that proves and closes rather than the whole of it.

Start an application pentest yourself, free to test, no card to start. If you want to talk through scope first, get in touch.